The nation’s Supreme Administrative Court has successfully prohibited camera drone flights through a judgment. Camera-equipped drones are monitoring video cameras, the court argues, which implies they require a license showing that they’ll be utilized to prevent criminal offense or mishaps. And given that you most likely aren’t flying a drone to watch your house, you’re most likely out of luck.
It will not surprise you to hear that regional drone owners are distressed. The market group UAS Sweden competes that the court might be eliminating Sweden’s drone market. Aftonbladet, on the other hand, mentions that the judgment does not make good sense in the context of existing laws. It’s legal for Swedes to record images in public locations, so why is it incorrect even if that cam is connected to a quadcopter? There are no journalistic exceptions, either, which is strange when other laws permit it.
The one alleviation is that the judgment might be difficult to impose. It depends on county administrative boards to report any offenses to the authorities, and it could be challenging to make charges stick if there isn’t really proof of a video camera drone in flight. Obviously, that raises another concern: why rule versus these drones when it could be fairly simple for amateur operators to neglect the decision? The relocation might mainly penalize those pros who have a great need to record drone video footage, whether they’re reporters or filmmakers.
