Judge rejects suit over Tesla Model 3 production

by SpeedLux
Tesla Model 3 production car

A federal judge in San Francisco rejected for the second time a securities fraud lawsuit brought by Tesla Inc shareholders accusing the company of misleading comments regarding the production status of its Model 3.

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer dismissed the lawsuit brought in October 2017. Breyer dismissed the original lawsuit in August but permitted plaintiffs to file an amended one.

The lawsuit sought class-action status for shareholders who bought automaker’s stock between May 3, 2016 through November 1, 2017.

It stated shareholders purchased “artificially inflated” shares because CEO Elon Musk and other executives misled them with optimistic statements about the production increase of the Model 3, failing to reveal that the company was “woefully unprepared” for the vehicle’s production.

Tesla argued in its defense that it had been forthcoming regarding obstacles with Model 3 production, including repeated statements by Musk that Tesla was going through “production hell”.

Breyer wrote that the accusations of fraud ignored automaker’s “repeated warnings about Model 3 production risks.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


SpeedLux is a high-authority automotive blog providing the latest automotive news and reviews. SpeedLux covers everything related to cars, bikes, and motorcycles, from news and reviews, to troubleshooting guides, tips and tricks, and more. SpeedLux was born in 2009 and we have over 20,000 articles published on our blog. We thank all our readers, as well as our partners, without whom we could not have reached this level.


©2009 – 2024 SpeedLux – Daily Automotive News and Reviews. All Right Reserved.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More